Comparing Vaccination in Public and Private Settings
Author Information
Author(s): Pandolfi Elisabetta, Graziani Maria C, Ieraci Roberto, Cavagni Giovanni, Tozzi Alberto E
Primary Institution: Bambino Gesù Pediatric Hospital, Rome, Italy
Hypothesis
Do different types of vaccine providers attract high-risk children differently?
Conclusion
Children with underlying diseases or low birthweight were more frequently immunised in the hospital, suggesting that hospital settings may improve vaccination uptake in high-risk groups.
Supporting Evidence
- Children immunised in the hospital were more frequently firstborn and had a lower birthweight.
- The prevalence of high-risk children immunised in the hospital was significantly higher than in the public service.
- Immunisation delays were more common in the hospital practice compared to the public service.
Takeaway
This study found that kids with health issues are more likely to get their vaccines at hospitals than at public clinics, which might help them get vaccinated on time.
Methodology
A cross-sectional study was conducted with parents of children aged 2-36 months attending either a public or private immunisation provider, collecting data through face-to-face interviews.
Potential Biases
Parents may have misinformation about vaccination, leading to delays or missed immunisations.
Limitations
The study may not be generalizable to other settings due to its specific local context.
Participant Demographics
Parents of children aged 2-36 months, with a mix of public and private service users.
Statistical Information
P-Value
0.001
Confidence Interval
95% CI: 1.08 – 9.42
Statistical Significance
p<0.05
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website