Nurse-led follow-up of patients after oesophageal or gastric cardia cancer surgery: a randomised trial
2009

Nurse-led follow-up after oesophageal cancer surgery

Sample size: 109 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Verschuur E M L, Steyerberg E W, Tilanus H W, Polinder S, Essink-Bot M-L, Tran K T C, van der Gaast A, Stassen L P S, Kuipers E J, Siersema P D

Primary Institution: Erasmus MC University Medical Centre Rotterdam

Hypothesis

Can nurse-led follow-up improve quality of life and patient satisfaction compared to standard follow-up after oesophageal or gastric cardia cancer surgery?

Conclusion

Nurse-led follow-up at home does not adversely affect quality of life or patient satisfaction compared to standard follow-up and is likely to be more cost effective.

Supporting Evidence

  • Nurse-led follow-up had lower medical costs compared to standard follow-up.
  • Patients in the nurse-led group reported similar quality of life scores over time.
  • Spouses of patients in the nurse-led group were more satisfied with the follow-up.
  • Body weight remained stable in the nurse-led follow-up group, while it deteriorated in the standard group.

Takeaway

This study shows that having a nurse visit patients at home after surgery for oesophageal cancer can be just as good as going to the hospital for check-ups, and it might even save money.

Methodology

Patients were randomized to either standard follow-up at the outpatient clinic or nurse-led follow-up at home, with quality of life and satisfaction assessed at multiple time points.

Potential Biases

Patients who preferred standard follow-up may have been less likely to participate.

Limitations

The study had a limited sample size and was designed to detect a major difference in quality of life.

Participant Demographics

Patients were primarily adults who underwent surgery for oesophageal or gastric cardia cancer.

Statistical Information

P-Value

0.04

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1038/sj.bjc.6604811

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication