Diagnostic accuracy of an integrated respiratory guideline in identifying patients with respiratory symptoms requiring screening for pulmonary tuberculosis: a cross-sectional study
2006

Evaluating a Guideline for Tuberculosis Screening

Sample size: 1392 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): René G English, Max O Bachmann, Eric D Bateman, Merrick F Zwarenstein, Lara R Fairall, Angeni Bheekie, Majara Bosielo P, Carl Lombard, Robert Scherpbier, Salah Eddine Ottomani

Primary Institution: University of Cape Town Lung Institute

Hypothesis

The study aims to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the PALSA guideline in identifying patients requiring screening for tuberculosis.

Conclusion

The PALSA guideline is an effective screening tool for identifying patients requiring bacteriological screening for pulmonary tuberculosis in a primary care setting.

Supporting Evidence

  • The nurse identified 516 patients as TB suspects compared to 365 by physicians.
  • The sensitivity of the nurse using the guideline was 76% and specificity was 77%.
  • Weight loss, pleuritic pain, and night sweats were strongly associated with confirmed TB.

Takeaway

This study shows that nurses can use a special guideline to help find patients who might have tuberculosis, which is really important for getting them the right care.

Methodology

A prospective, cross-sectional study evaluating 1392 adult patients with respiratory symptoms using the PALSA guideline.

Potential Biases

Potential bias due to the reliance on clinical judgment without access to all diagnostic tools.

Limitations

The absence of sputum testing in patients not suspected of tuberculosis by primary care physicians limited the ability to use bacteriological diagnosis as the reference standard.

Participant Demographics

Median age of participants was 48 years, with 63% female; many had chronic respiratory diseases.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.05

Confidence Interval

95% CI 71%–79%

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1471-2466-6-22

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication