De-Orphaning the Structural Proteome through Reciprocal Comparison of Evolutionarily Important Structural Features Annotating Protein Structures
2008

Improving Protein Function Prediction Using Evolutionary Trace Annotation

Sample size: 1218 publication 10 minutes Evidence: high

Author Information

Author(s): Ward R. Matthew, Erdin Serkan, Tran Tuan A., Kristensen David M., Lisewski Andreas Martin, Lichtarge Olivier

Primary Institution: Baylor College of Medicine

Hypothesis

Can focusing on key functional features of protein structures improve the accuracy of function prediction?

Conclusion

The study developed a new algorithm that increased annotation specificity to 100% for enzymes while maintaining a sensitivity of approximately 60%.

Supporting Evidence

  • The new matching algorithm enabled large-scale searches for reciprocal matches.
  • Reciprocal ETA achieved better than 92% accuracy in enzyme predictions.
  • ETA was applied to 2935 unannotated structural genomics proteins and predicted enzymatic functions in 320 cases.

Takeaway

This study created a new way to predict what proteins do by looking closely at their important parts, and it worked really well for many proteins.

Methodology

The study used a new algorithm to extract local motifs from protein structures based on evolutionary importance and assessed their similarity to other structures.

Potential Biases

There is a risk of misannotation for non-enzymes when applying the method to unannotated proteins.

Limitations

The method may not accurately predict functions for proteins with low sequence identity.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.05

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1371/journal.pone.0002136

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication