Effect on birth outcomes of a formalised approach to care in hospital labour assessment units: international, randomised controlled trial
2008

Impact of Structured Care on Birth Outcomes

Sample size: 5002 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Hodnett Ellen D, Stremler Robyn, Willan Andrew R, Weston Julie A, Lowe Nancy K, Simpson Kathleen R, Fraser William D, Gafni Amiram

Primary Institution: Lawrence S Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto

Hypothesis

A complex nursing and midwifery intervention in hospital labour assessment units would increase the likelihood of spontaneous vaginal birth and improve other maternal and neonatal outcomes.

Conclusion

A structured approach to care in hospital labour assessment units increased satisfaction with care and was suggestive of a modest increase in the likelihood of spontaneous vaginal birth.

Supporting Evidence

  • The rate of spontaneous vaginal birth was 64.0% in the structured care group compared to 61.3% in the usual care group.
  • Women in the structured care group were less likely to report disappointment with the amount of attention received from staff.
  • Fewer women in the structured care group rated staff helpfulness as less than very helpful.

Takeaway

This study looked at how a special way of caring for women in labor can help them have their babies more easily and feel better about their care.

Methodology

Multicentre, randomised controlled trial with prognostic stratification by hospital.

Potential Biases

Potential for contamination between groups due to the nature of care in the labour assessment units.

Limitations

Results did not reach conventional levels of statistical significance for most outcomes.

Participant Demographics

Participants were 5002 nulliparous women experiencing contractions but not in active labour, with a mean age of 26.7 years.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.05 for primary outcome.

Confidence Interval

95% confidence interval 0.96 to 1.27 for spontaneous vaginal birth.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1136/bmj.a1021

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication