Detection of a MicroRNA Signal in an In Vivo Expression Set of mRNAs MiRNA/mRNA Correlated Pairs
2007

Detecting MicroRNA and mRNA Correlations in Brain Tumors

Sample size: 12 publication Evidence: high

Author Information

Author(s): Liu Tsunglin, Papagiannakopoulos Thales, Puskar Kathy, Qi Shuping, Santiago Fernando, Clay William, Lao Kaiqin, Lee Yohan, Nelson Stanley F., Kornblum Harley I., Doyle Frank, Petzold Linda, Shraiman Boris, Kosik Kenneth S.

Primary Institution: University of California at Santa Barbara

Hypothesis

Can endogenous fluctuations in a set of mRNA and miRNA profiles contain correlated changes that are statistically distinguishable from random fluctuations?

Conclusion

The study found that there are significant endogenous correlations between miRNA and mRNA levels in brain tumors, suggesting a potential tumor suppression pathway linked to miR-181c.

Supporting Evidence

  • The study identified an excess of high positive and negative correlation pairs between miRNAs and mRNAs.
  • Experimental validation showed that manipulating miRNA levels affected the corresponding mRNA levels.
  • Correlation analysis revealed that most high correlation pairs did not predict a target relationship.

Takeaway

The researchers looked at brain tumor samples to see if certain tiny molecules called miRNAs and their target genes (mRNAs) were connected. They found that when one changes, the other often does too, which could help us understand how tumors grow.

Methodology

RNA was extracted from 12 human brain tumor biopsies, and genome-wide mRNA expression levels were determined by microarray analysis while miRNA profiles were measured by real-time reverse transcription PCR.

Potential Biases

The results may include false positives due to the high number of correlations tested.

Limitations

The study's findings are limited to the specific tumor samples analyzed and cannot directly address carcinogenesis.

Participant Demographics

The study involved 12 human brain tumor samples with varying histological diagnoses.

Statistical Information

P-Value

1.4*10−11

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1371/journal.pone.0000804

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication