Prognostic variables for the selection of patients with operable soft tissue sarcomas to be considered in adjuvant chemotherapy trials
1992

Prognostic Factors for Soft Tissue Sarcomas

Sample size: 141 publication Evidence: high

Author Information

Author(s): A. Ravaud, N.B. Buil, J.M. Coindre, P. Lagarde, P. Tramond, F. Bonichon, E. Stockle, G. Kantor, M. Trojani, J. Chauvergnel, D. Maree

Primary Institution: Fondation Bergonie, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Bordeaux, France

Hypothesis

Can prognostic variables help select patients with operable soft tissue sarcomas for adjuvant chemotherapy trials?

Conclusion

Tumour grade and depth are significant prognostic factors for overall and metastasis-free survival in patients with operable soft tissue sarcomas.

Supporting Evidence

  • Patients with grade 1 tumors had a 5-year overall survival rate of 97.8%.
  • Patients with deep grade 3 tumors had a 5-year overall survival rate of 31.7%.
  • Overall survival was significantly better in patients with limb primaries compared to non-limb tumors (P = 0.05).
  • Patients with tumors less than 5 cm had significantly better overall survival (P = 0.01).
  • Patients with invasion of neurovascular structures had significantly worse overall survival (P = 0.003).

Takeaway

Doctors can use certain characteristics of tumors to figure out which patients might need extra treatment after surgery for soft tissue sarcomas.

Methodology

The study analyzed 141 patients with non-metastatic soft tissue sarcoma treated with surgery and radiotherapy, evaluating prognostic variables through univariate and multivariate analyses.

Potential Biases

Potential bias due to the retrospective nature of the study and the exclusion of certain patient groups.

Limitations

The study only included patients treated at a single institution and excluded those who received preoperative or adjuvant chemotherapy.

Participant Demographics

77 males and 64 females, aged 16 to 87 with a median age of 50.3 years.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.0001

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication