A controlled trial of the effectiveness of internet continuing medical education
2008

Effectiveness of Internet Continuing Medical Education

Sample size: 5621 publication Evidence: high

Author Information

Author(s): Linda Casebeer, Sally Engler, Nancy Bennett, Martin Irvine, Destry Sulkes, Marc DesLauriers, Sijian Zhang

Primary Institution: Outcomes, Inc.

Hypothesis

Physicians participating in internet CME activities would make evidence-based clinical practice choices more frequently than physicians who did not participate.

Conclusion

Physicians who participated in selected internet CME activities were more likely to make evidence-based clinical choices than non-participants.

Supporting Evidence

  • Participants showed a 45% increased likelihood of making evidence-based choices.
  • Interactive case-based activities had a higher effect size than text-based updates.
  • Primary care physicians had a higher effect size compared to specialists.

Takeaway

Doctors who took online medical education courses made better decisions based on evidence than those who didn't.

Methodology

A controlled trial using case vignette surveys administered to US physicians and a control group of non-participants.

Potential Biases

Participants may have accessed more medical information online than non-participants, potentially influencing results.

Limitations

The number of clinical vignette questions was limited, and there was a lack of baseline data on practice patterns of CME participants.

Participant Demographics

The sample included 5621 US physicians, with 1377 primary care physicians and 1241 specialists.

Statistical Information

P-Value

<0.001

Statistical Significance

p<0.001

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1741-7015-6-37

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication