Case-mix fails to explain variation in mastectomy rates: management of screen-detected breast cancer in a UK region 1997–2003
2005

Variation in Mastectomy Rates for Breast Cancer in the UK

Sample size: 5109 publication Evidence: high

Author Information

Author(s): Caldon L J M, Walters S J, Reed J A, Murphy A, Worley A, Reed M W R

Primary Institution: The University of Sheffield

Hypothesis

Does variation in surgical practice for breast cancer persist after adjusting for case-mix?

Conclusion

Significant variation in mastectomy rates exists across breast screening units, which is not explained by case-mix factors.

Supporting Evidence

  • The study found a mastectomy rate of 35.8% across the Trent region.
  • Mastectomy rates varied significantly between units, ranging from 25% to 45%.
  • The analysis adjusted for factors like tumor size and patient age but still showed variation.

Takeaway

Different hospitals in the UK perform mastectomies at very different rates, and this can't just be explained by the types of patients they treat.

Methodology

The study analyzed individual patient-level data from the Trent Breast Screening Programme using logistic regression to assess mastectomy rates.

Potential Biases

Potential biases due to the use of a single region's data and the exclusion of non-screen-detected cases.

Limitations

The study only includes screen-detected breast cancers and may not represent the broader population.

Participant Demographics

The majority of participants were women aged 50-64 with small tumors.

Statistical Information

P-Value

<0.0001

Confidence Interval

95% CI: 34.5–37.1%

Statistical Significance

p<0.0001

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1038/sj.bjc.6602264

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication