Measurement of aortic pulse wave velocity in CMR: comparison of transit time estimators
2011

Measuring Aortic Pulse Wave Velocity with New Methods

Sample size: 50 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Dogui Anas, Redheuil Alban, Lefort Muriel, Decesare Alain, Herment Alain, Mousseaux Elie

Primary Institution: Inserm, Paris, France

Hypothesis

The study investigates the efficacy of a new method for estimating transit time from CMR flow curves compared to existing methods.

Conclusion

The TT-Upslope and TT-Wave methods provide better correlations with physiological parameters and are less sensitive to measurement limitations.

Supporting Evidence

  • TT-Upslope and TT-Wave methods showed better correlation with aging and other physiological parameters.
  • The TT-Upslope method had a higher reproducibility of 4%.
  • Both methods reduced the impact of low temporal resolution and noise in measurements.

Takeaway

Researchers tested a new way to measure how fast blood flows in the aorta and found it works better than older methods.

Methodology

Fifty healthy subjects underwent various measurements including cf-PWV and CMR exams to estimate arch-PWV using different transit time methods.

Limitations

The study may not be applicable to populations outside the healthy subjects tested.

Participant Demographics

Fifty healthy subjects, divided into two age groups: ≤37 years and ≥38 years.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.001

Statistical Significance

p<0.001

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1532-429X-13-S1-P13

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication