Ability of History Taking Alone to Identify Early Pregnancies Among Potential Measles Vaccinees
1994

Identifying Early Pregnancies Before Measles Vaccination

Sample size: 326 publication Evidence: low

Author Information

Author(s): Philip B. Mead

Primary Institution: University of Vermont College of Medicine

Hypothesis

Can history taking alone effectively identify early pregnancies among potential female measles vaccinees?

Conclusion

History taking alone failed to identify three pregnancies among 326 women, suggesting that additional measures may be necessary.

Supporting Evidence

  • Three pregnancies were confirmed among women who denied being pregnant.
  • Two of the three women could not provide an exact date for their last menstrual period.
  • History taking alone is currently recommended but failed to identify all pregnancies.

Takeaway

The study found that just asking women if they are pregnant before giving them a measles vaccine missed some who were actually pregnant.

Methodology

The study involved 326 female health care workers who denied being pregnant and underwent urine pregnancy tests before vaccination.

Potential Biases

There is a possibility that some women may have known about the pregnancy test and could have misrepresented their status.

Limitations

The study's findings may not be generalizable to other populations or settings.

Participant Demographics

Participants were female health care workers aged 15 to 50 years.

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication