Using Card Sorting to Make Treatment Decisions for Alzheimer's Patients
Author Information
Author(s): Pazart Lionel, Vidal Chrystelle, Chalon Didier Faivre, Gauthier Sophie, Schepens Florent, Cretin Elodie, Beal Jean-Louis, Pfitzenmeyer Pierre, Aubry Régis
Primary Institution: Besançon University Hospital
Hypothesis
How can ethical decision-making be improved for treatment of Alzheimer's patients at the end of life?
Conclusion
The card sorting method was effectively adopted by healthcare professionals to facilitate discussions about treatment decisions for Alzheimer's patients.
Supporting Evidence
- The card sorting method allows for anonymous sharing of opinions.
- Participants felt more comfortable discussing treatment options without judgment.
- The study involved 67 health centers across eastern France.
Takeaway
This study used a card game to help doctors and caregivers decide how to treat patients with Alzheimer's disease who are very sick. It helped everyone share their thoughts without feeling judged.
Methodology
Cross-sectional multicentre study using the card sorting technique with 36 cards to gather opinions from medical staff and caregivers.
Potential Biases
Potential bias from the hierarchical nature of medical teams affecting open discussion.
Limitations
The study's findings may not be generalizable beyond the specific institutions involved.
Participant Demographics
Participants included healthcare professionals from various medical and social institutions in eastern France.
Statistical Information
P-Value
p<0.05
Statistical Significance
p<0.05
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website