Mental health and injury: A study on their relationship
Author Information
Author(s): Cameron Cate M, Purdie David M, Kliewer Erich V, McClure Rod J
Primary Institution: Griffith University
Hypothesis
This study aimed to quantify the relationship between injury and mental health service use over a 10-year period.
Conclusion
Injured individuals have a significantly higher rate of mental health service use compared to non-injured individuals, even after accounting for pre-existing mental health conditions.
Supporting Evidence
- The injured cohort had 6.56 times the rate of post-injury mental health hospitalisations compared to the non-injured cohort.
- Statistically significant differences in mental health service use were observed for every year of the follow-up period.
- Adjusting for pre-existing conditions reduced the rate ratios but did not eliminate the significantly elevated risk for the injured cohort.
Takeaway
If someone gets hurt, they might need more help for their feelings and mental health afterward, even if they were already feeling sad or anxious before the injury.
Methodology
The study used a retrospective matched cohort design with linked administrative data to compare mental health service use between injured and non-injured individuals over 10 years.
Potential Biases
Potential confounding factors such as socio-economic status and health behaviors were not included in the analysis.
Limitations
The study may have overestimated the mental health service use attributed to injury due to unmeasured confounders.
Participant Demographics
The injured cohort included adults aged 18-64, with a majority being male (64%) and a significant portion living in urban areas (40%).
Statistical Information
Confidence Interval
95% CI 5.87, 7.34
Statistical Significance
p<0.05
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website