Serum screening with Down's syndrome markers to predict pre-eclampsia and small for gestational age: Systematic review and meta-analysis
2008

Using Down's Syndrome Markers to Predict Pre-eclampsia and Small for Gestational Age

Sample size: 551642 publication Evidence: low

Author Information

Author(s): Morris Rachel K, Cnossen Jeltsje S, Langejans Marloes, Robson Stephen C, Kleijnen Jos, ter Riet Gerben, Mol Ben W, van der Post Joris AM, Khan Khalid S

Primary Institution: Academic Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Birmingham

Hypothesis

Can serum analytes used in Down's syndrome screening accurately predict pre-eclampsia and small for gestational age?

Conclusion

Down's serum screening analytes have low predictive accuracy for pre-eclampsia and small for gestational age.

Supporting Evidence

  • Five serum screening markers were evaluated across 44 studies for pre-eclampsia and 86 studies for small for gestational age.
  • The best predictor for pre-eclampsia was inhibin A>2.79MoM.
  • For small for gestational age, the best predictor was AFP>2.0MoM.
  • Overall, the predictive accuracy of the serum markers was low.

Takeaway

Doctors used blood tests to try to predict if pregnant women would have problems like pre-eclampsia or having small babies, but the tests didn't work very well.

Methodology

The study systematically reviewed and meta-analyzed data from various databases and included studies that reported on serum analytes used in Down's syndrome screening before the 25th week of gestation.

Potential Biases

There was poor reporting of patient selection criteria and blinding of the reference test.

Limitations

The included studies were heterogeneous, and there were methodological and reporting limitations.

Participant Demographics

The study included 551,642 pregnant women, with 4,376 cases of pre-eclampsia and 20,339 cases of small for gestational age.

Statistical Information

Confidence Interval

95% CI ranges provided for various likelihood ratios.

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1471-2393-8-33

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication