The reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Dutch version of the Oxford elbow score
2011

Dutch Version of the Oxford Elbow Score: Reliability and Validity

Sample size: 69 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): de Haan Jeroen, Goei Harold, Schep Niels WL, Tuinebreijer Wim E, Patka Peter, den Hartog Dennis

Primary Institution: Westfriesgasthuis and Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam

Hypothesis

The study aims to develop and evaluate the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Dutch version of the Oxford elbow score (OES) for patients after elbow trauma and surgery.

Conclusion

The Dutch OES is a reliable and valid 12-item questionnaire that can be completed within several minutes by patients with elbow injuries.

Supporting Evidence

  • The Dutch OES was validated with a cohort of 69 patients.
  • The Cronbach's α coefficients for the function, pain, and social-psychological domains were 0.90, 0.87, and 0.90, respectively.
  • The intra-class correlation coefficients for the domains were 0.87 for function, 0.89 for pain, and 0.87 for social-psychological.

Takeaway

This study created a Dutch version of a questionnaire to help doctors understand how elbow injuries affect patients, and it works well.

Methodology

The OES was translated into Dutch, validated with 69 patients, and tested for reliability and responsiveness with a separate group of 43 patients.

Potential Biases

The variability in time between OES administrations could have influenced the results.

Limitations

The study had small sample sizes and a homogeneous patient population, which may limit the generalizability of the findings.

Participant Demographics

The mean age of patients in group A was 43.4 years, with 75% female; in group B, the mean age was 50.9 years, with 63% female.

Statistical Information

Confidence Interval

(0.75, 0.93)

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1749-799X-6-39

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication