Quality of Medical Records at a Hospital in Iran
Author Information
Author(s): Pourasghar Faramarz, Malekafzali Hossein, Kazemi Alireza, Ellenius Johan, Fors Uno
Primary Institution: Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
Hypothesis
The study aims to evaluate the quality of documentation of Paper-based Medical Records in a university hospital in Iran.
Conclusion
The study found that Medical Records at the university hospital were not documented properly, affecting their reliability for medical care.
Supporting Evidence
- Almost all Medical Records had problems in terms of quality of documentation.
- There was no record in which all information was documented correctly.
- Interviewees cited poor handwriting and high workload as major issues.
Takeaway
Doctors and nurses at the hospital are not filling out patient records correctly, which can lead to problems in patient care.
Methodology
The study evaluated 300 randomly selected Medical Records and conducted interviews with 10 physicians and 10 nurses.
Potential Biases
Potential bias from self-reported data during interviews with medical staff.
Limitations
The study was limited to one hospital and focused only on Paper-based Medical Records.
Participant Demographics
Participants included 10 physicians and 10 nurses from the hospital.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website