Decision-making in percutaneous coronary intervention: a survey
2008

Survey on Decision-Making in Heart Procedures

Sample size: 133 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Catherine R Rahilly-Tierney, Ira S Nash

Primary Institution: Mount Sinai Medical Center

Hypothesis

Do physicians perceive themselves as involved in PCI decision-making?

Conclusion

Most physicians believe that collaboration in PCI decision-making is the best approach.

Supporting Evidence

  • 89% of non-cardiologists felt PCI decisions were made solely by the interventionalist.
  • 66% of non-cardiologists preferred collaboration in PCI decision-making.
  • 92% of cardiologists believed collaboration is the best process for PCI decisions.

Takeaway

Doctors think it's better to work together when deciding on heart procedures instead of one person making the choice alone.

Methodology

An anonymous survey was mailed to internal medicine faculty to assess their perceptions of involvement in PCI decisions.

Potential Biases

Responses may reflect a disproportionate number of discordant views due to low response rate.

Limitations

Only 35% of surveys were returned, and the sample may not represent all referring physicians.

Participant Demographics

Internal medicine faculty from a single academic medical center.

Statistical Information

P-Value

0.68

Statistical Significance

p=0.68

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1472-6947-8-28

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication