The Gold Standard Publication Checklist (GSPC) for improved design, reporting and scientific quality of animal studies GSPC versus ARRIVE guidelines
2011
Improving Animal Study Reporting with GSPC
publication
Author Information
Author(s): Carlijn Hooijmans, C de Vries, M Leenaars, M Ritskes-Hoitinga
Primary Institution: Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre
Hypothesis
The Gold Standard Publication Checklist (GSPC) can improve the design and reporting of animal studies.
Conclusion
The GSPC is essential for enhancing the quality of animal studies and making systematic reviews more feasible.
Supporting Evidence
- Many animal studies are poorly reported, which affects their scientific quality.
- The GSPC provides detailed guidelines for planning and executing animal experiments.
- Using checklists can help reduce unnecessary duplication of animal experiments.
Takeaway
This study suggests that using a checklist can help scientists do better animal experiments and report their findings more clearly.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website