Genome-Wide Detection of Allele Specific Copy Number Variation Associated with Insulin Resistance in African Americans from the HyperGEN Study
2011

Genetic Study of Insulin Resistance in African Americans

Sample size: 1040 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Irvin Marguerite R., Wineinger Nathan E., Rice Treva K., Pajewski Nicholas M., Kabagambe Edmond K., Gu Charles C., Pankow Jim, North Kari E., Wilk Jemma B., Freedman Barry I., Franceschini Nora, Broeckel Uli, Tiwari Hemant K., Arnett Donna K.

Primary Institution: University of Alabama at Birmingham

Hypothesis

What is the joint association of SNPs and CNVs with fasting insulin and insulin resistance in African Americans?

Conclusion

The study highlights several genetic markers associated with insulin resistance in African Americans, which differ from those found in European populations.

Supporting Evidence

  • The study analyzed 872,243 SNPs and identified several markers associated with insulin resistance.
  • Markers rs6576507 and rs8026527 were significantly associated with fasting insulin levels.
  • The study found that African Americans have unique genetic influences on insulin resistance compared to European populations.

Takeaway

This study looked at how certain genes might affect insulin resistance in African Americans, finding some important differences compared to other groups.

Methodology

The study used genome-wide association analysis to examine SNPs and CNVs in relation to fasting insulin and HOMA-IR in a sample of African Americans.

Potential Biases

Potential bias due to the underrepresentation of African Americans in previous studies and the specific recruitment methods used.

Limitations

The study is limited to African Americans and may not generalize to other populations; also, the sample size may limit the power to detect associations.

Participant Demographics

The mean age of participants was 43.5 years, with 66% being female.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<5*10−8

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1371/journal.pone.0024052

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication