Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial of sublingual immunotherapy in natural rubber latex allergic patients
2011

Study on Sublingual Immunotherapy for Latex Allergy

Sample size: 28 publication Evidence: low

Author Information

Author(s): Gabriel Gastaminza, Jaime Algorta, Olga Uriel, Maria T Audicana, Eduardo Fernandez, Maria L Sanz, Daniel Munoz

Primary Institution: Department of Allergology, Hospital Santiago-Apostol, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain

Hypothesis

The study aims to assess the efficacy and tolerability of latex sublingual immunotherapy in adult patients undergoing permanent latex avoidance.

Conclusion

Further studies are needed to evaluate latex-sublingual immunotherapy, since efficacy could not be demonstrated in adult patients with avoidance of the allergen.

Supporting Evidence

  • No significant difference in efficacy was observed between active and placebo groups.
  • An improvement in the average percentage of basophils activated was noted.
  • Two patients dropped out due to adverse reactions during the maintenance phase.

Takeaway

This study tested a new treatment for people allergic to latex, but it didn't show that the treatment worked better than a placebo.

Methodology

The study was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with 28 adult latex-allergic patients receiving either active treatment or placebo over two years.

Potential Biases

Potential bias due to the subjective nature of patient-reported outcomes and the small sample size.

Limitations

The study had a small sample size and a high dropout rate, which may affect the results.

Participant Demographics

28 adult patients (5 males and 23 females) with a mean age of 39 years.

Statistical Information

Confidence Interval

95% CI: 0.59-13.95

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1745-6215-12-191

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication