Disaggregation of Human Solid Tumors
Author Information
Author(s): S.A. Engelholm, M. Spang-Thomsen, N. Brunner, I. Nohr, L.L. Vindeløv
Primary Institution: University Institute of Pathological Anatomy, University of Copenhagen
Hypothesis
The study compares the effectiveness of combined mechanical and enzymatic methods for disaggregating human solid tumors.
Conclusion
The long-term trypsinization technique is superior for obtaining viable tumor cells compared to mechanical methods.
Supporting Evidence
- The combined techniques provided reproducible cell yields of 2-10 x 10^7 viable cells per gram of tissue.
- Only the long-term trypsinization procedure resulted in a representative cell yield from all the tumors tested.
- The mechanical method generally resulted in a very small number of cells.
Takeaway
Scientists found a better way to break down tumors into single cells using a special enzyme, which helps study cancer better.
Methodology
The study compared two combined mechanical and enzymatic disaggregation techniques and a simple mechanical method on human solid tumors.
Limitations
The mechanical method produced very few viable cells, and some tumors could not be grown in vitro.
Participant Demographics
Seven human solid tumors, including small cell lung carcinomas, breast carcinomas, and a malignant melanoma.
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website