Through the rear view mirror: a content evaluation of the journal of Chiropractic & Osteopathy for the years 2005–2008
2008

Evaluation of Chiropractic & Osteopathy Journal from 2005 to 2008

Sample size: 83 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Ian D Coulter, Raheleh Khorsan

Primary Institution: RAND Corp.

Hypothesis

How well has the Chiropractic & Osteopathy journal achieved its stated objectives from 2005 to 2008?

Conclusion

The journal has had mixed success in achieving its objectives, with a stronger focus on chiropractic than osteopathy.

Supporting Evidence

  • 83 full-length articles were published in the journal from April 2005 to September 12, 2008.
  • Only 4 of the 83 articles were focused on osteopathy.
  • 40 articles originated from the USA, indicating a dominance in publication from that country.
  • 37% of the articles published were primary research studies.

Takeaway

This study looked at articles published in a chiropractic journal to see if it met its goals, and found it mostly focused on chiropractic rather than osteopathy.

Methodology

Reviewed all abstracts for articles published from 2005 to 2008 and categorized them based on various criteria.

Potential Biases

The dominance of articles from the USA may skew the journal's representation as an international publication.

Limitations

The journal has a strong focus on chiropractic, with very few articles on osteopathy, which may not meet the expectations of all readers.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1746-1340-16-14

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication