Walk-ins seeking treatment at an emergency department or general practitioner out-of-hours service: a cross-sectional comparison
2011

Comparing Emergency Department and Out-of-Hours GP Services for Walk-In Patients

Sample size: 2974 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Corinne Chmiel, Carola A Huber, Thomas Rosemann, Marco Zoller, Klaus Eichler, Patrick Sidler, Oliver Senn

Primary Institution: Institute of General Practice and Health Services Research, University of Zurich

Hypothesis

What are the differences between walk-in patients seeking treatment at an emergency department and those using out-of-hours GP services?

Conclusion

There are significant differences in patient demographics and medical problems between those seeking care at emergency departments and those using out-of-hours GP services.

Supporting Evidence

  • Patients at the GP-C were significantly older (58.9 vs. 43.8 years) and more often female (63.5 vs. 46.9%) compared to patients at the ED.
  • Outpatient care was more common at the GP-C (85.7%) than at the ED (79.9%).
  • Injuries were the most common diagnoses in ED walk-in patients (45.5%).
  • The majority of consultations in both settings could be resolved without hospitalization.

Takeaway

This study looked at people who go to the emergency room versus those who go to a doctor after hours, finding that they are often different types of patients with different needs.

Methodology

Data was collected from patient-doctor encounters at an emergency department and a GP cooperative over two evaluation periods.

Potential Biases

Potential bias due to differences in patient demographics and health-seeking behavior between settings.

Limitations

Data collection at the GP-C was not conducted in parallel with the ED during winter, which may affect seasonal diagnosis comparisons.

Participant Demographics

Patients at the GP-C were significantly older and more often female compared to those at the ED.

Statistical Information

P-Value

0.016

Confidence Interval

95 CI 0.98-0.99

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1472-6963-11-94

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication