Genealogical lineage sorting leads to significant, but incorrect Bayesian multilocus inference of population structure
2011

Genealogical Lineage Sorting and Population Structure in Drosophila

Sample size: 569 publication 10 minutes Evidence: high

Author Information

Author(s): Pablo Orozco-terWengel, Jukka Corander, Christian Schlötterer

Primary Institution: Institut für Populationsgenetik, Vetmeduni Vienna

Hypothesis

How do the number of microsatellite markers and their chromosomal locations affect the inference of population structure?

Conclusion

Using a large number of microsatellite markers can lead to more reliable inferences of population structure, as fewer markers may yield statistically significant but incorrect results.

Supporting Evidence

  • The study used 137 microsatellite markers to analyze genetic variation in Drosophila melanogaster.
  • Statistical support for clustering solutions was high, with posterior probabilities larger than 0.95.
  • Different combinations of markers often resulted in significantly different inferences of population structure.

Takeaway

This study shows that using many genetic markers helps scientists understand how different populations of fruit flies are related, but using too few markers can give wrong answers.

Methodology

The study analyzed microsatellite markers from Drosophila melanogaster across 21 populations to assess population structure using Bayesian clustering methods.

Potential Biases

Potential biases may arise from the selection of markers and the populations sampled, which could affect the generalizability of the results.

Limitations

The study's findings may not apply to all species or populations, as the results are specific to Drosophila melanogaster and the markers used.

Participant Demographics

Samples were collected from 21 localities worldwide, including regions in China, Taiwan, Malaysia, and several European countries.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.01

Statistical Significance

p<0.0004

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04990.x

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication