Quality Management Systems in Hospitals: A Comparison of Three Countries
Author Information
Author(s): C. Wagner, L. Gulácsi, E. Takacs, M. Outinen
Primary Institution: Nivel, Netherlands institute for Health Services Research
Hypothesis
Governmental legislation or financial stimulation can stimulate the use of QM-activities better than recommendations alone.
Conclusion
The study shows that differences in the implementation of QM-activities can be measured at a national level, but the hypothesis regarding the effectiveness of governmental legislation was not confirmed.
Supporting Evidence
- Only a small number of hospitals have implemented a QMS, with 4% in the Netherlands, 0% in Hungary, and 3% in Finland.
- More hospitals in the Netherlands focus on quality documents, while Finnish hospitals emphasize training in QM.
- Patient participation is largely neglected across all three countries.
Takeaway
The study looked at how hospitals in the Netherlands, Hungary, and Finland manage quality. It found that while there are some differences, many hospitals are not doing enough to involve patients in improving care.
Methodology
Cross-sectional design using a self-administered questionnaire sent to hospital directors and quality coordinators.
Potential Biases
A slight positive bias in results due to non-respondents reporting fewer QM-activities.
Limitations
The study relied on self-reported data, which may be subject to social desirability bias.
Participant Demographics
Hospitals from the Netherlands, Hungary, and Finland.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website