Comparing Two Methods for Implanting Access Ports in Cancer Patients
Author Information
Author(s): Knebel Philip, Fischer Lars, Cremonese Eva, Lopez-Benitez Ruben, Stampfl Ulrike, Radeleff Boris, Kauczor Hans-Ulrich, Büchler Markus W, Seiler Christoph M
Primary Institution: University of Heidelberg, Germany
Hypothesis
Which technique for implanting Totally Implantable Access Ports (TIAP) has the optimal benefit/risk ratio for patients?
Conclusion
The study aims to determine the success rates of two different techniques for TIAP implantation.
Supporting Evidence
- TIAPs are widely used for safe venous access in cancer patients.
- Previous studies show a median primary success rate of 80% for surgical Venae Sectio.
- Retrospective studies indicate a success rate of 99% for Puncture of Vena Subclavia.
Takeaway
Doctors are trying to find out which way to put in a special port for cancer treatment works better and is safer for patients.
Methodology
A single-center, randomized controlled trial comparing two techniques for TIAP implantation in 100 patients.
Potential Biases
Potential bias in randomization and treatment allocation due to the nature of the interventions.
Limitations
The study is limited to a single center and may not be generalizable to other settings.
Participant Demographics
Patients aged 18 years or older scheduled for primary elective TIAP implantation.
Statistical Information
P-Value
p<0.05
Confidence Interval
95%
Statistical Significance
p<0.05
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website