Protocol of an expertise based randomized trial comparing surgical Venae Sectio versus radiological Puncture of Vena Subclavia for insertion of Totally Implantable Access Port in oncological patients
2008

Comparing Two Methods for Implanting Access Ports in Cancer Patients

Sample size: 100 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Knebel Philip, Fischer Lars, Cremonese Eva, Lopez-Benitez Ruben, Stampfl Ulrike, Radeleff Boris, Kauczor Hans-Ulrich, Büchler Markus W, Seiler Christoph M

Primary Institution: University of Heidelberg, Germany

Hypothesis

Which technique for implanting Totally Implantable Access Ports (TIAP) has the optimal benefit/risk ratio for patients?

Conclusion

The study aims to determine the success rates of two different techniques for TIAP implantation.

Supporting Evidence

  • TIAPs are widely used for safe venous access in cancer patients.
  • Previous studies show a median primary success rate of 80% for surgical Venae Sectio.
  • Retrospective studies indicate a success rate of 99% for Puncture of Vena Subclavia.

Takeaway

Doctors are trying to find out which way to put in a special port for cancer treatment works better and is safer for patients.

Methodology

A single-center, randomized controlled trial comparing two techniques for TIAP implantation in 100 patients.

Potential Biases

Potential bias in randomization and treatment allocation due to the nature of the interventions.

Limitations

The study is limited to a single center and may not be generalizable to other settings.

Participant Demographics

Patients aged 18 years or older scheduled for primary elective TIAP implantation.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.05

Confidence Interval

95%

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1745-6215-9-60

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication