Correlation of umbilical cord blood haematopoietic stem and progenitor cell levels with birth weight: implications for a prenatal influence on cancer risk
2008

Link Between Birth Weight and Stem Cells in Umbilical Cord Blood

Sample size: 288 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Strohsnitter W C, Savarese T M, Low H P, Chelmow D P, Lagiou P, Lambe M, Edmiston K, Liu Q, Baik I, Noller K L, Adami H-O, Trichopoulos D, Hsieh C-C

Primary Institution: Tufts-New England Medical Center

Hypothesis

Is there a positive association between umbilical cord blood stem cell levels and birth weight?

Conclusion

Higher birth weights are associated with increased levels of certain stem cells in umbilical cord blood, supporting the idea that prenatal factors may influence cancer risk.

Supporting Evidence

  • The study found a positive correlation between birth weight and CD34+CD38− stem cells.
  • Each 500g increase in birth weight was associated with a 15.5% increase in stem cell concentration.
  • Newborns with birth weights below 3000g had higher stem cell concentrations than those in the 3000-3499g range.

Takeaway

Babies who weigh more at birth tend to have more stem cells in their umbilical cord blood, which might affect their risk of getting cancer later.

Methodology

The study analyzed umbilical cord blood samples from singleton infants to measure stem cell populations and their association with birth weight.

Potential Biases

Potential biases may arise from the selection of study participants and the variability in maternal and neonatal characteristics.

Limitations

The study may not account for all potential confounding factors influencing stem cell levels and birth weight.

Participant Demographics

Participants included singleton infants from diverse ethnic backgrounds, with varying birth weights and maternal ages.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.05

Confidence Interval

95% CI: 1.6–31.3%

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1038/sj.bjc.6604183

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication