Urine-based testing for Chlamydia trachomatis among young adults in a population-based survey in Croatia: Feasibility and prevalence
2011

Testing for Chlamydia in Young Adults in Croatia

Sample size: 1005 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Božičević Ivana, Grgić Ivana, Židovec-Lepej Snježana, Čakalo Jurja-Ivana, Belak-Kovačević Sanja, Štulhofer Aleksandar, Begovac Josip

Primary Institution: WHO Collaborating Centre for Capacity Development in HIV Surveillance; School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia

Hypothesis

Is it feasible to collect urine samples for testing Chlamydia trachomatis infection among young adults in Croatia?

Conclusion

The study found that population-based surveys can effectively estimate Chlamydia trachomatis prevalence among young adults in Croatia, although response rates for urine sample collection were low.

Supporting Evidence

  • 27.9% of men and 37.5% of women who were sexually experienced agreed to provide urine samples.
  • The prevalence of C trachomatis infection was 7.3% in men and 5.3% in women.
  • Women were significantly more likely to provide urine samples than men.

Takeaway

The study tested young adults in Croatia for a common infection called Chlamydia and found that many were willing to participate, but not enough actually provided samples.

Methodology

Participants were sampled using a nationally representative, multi-stage stratified probability sample, and urine samples were tested for C trachomatis DNA using a real-time PCR assay.

Potential Biases

There is a risk of bias due to the higher likelihood of those with riskier sexual behaviors to provide urine samples.

Limitations

The main limitation was the low response rate for urine specimen collection, which may not accurately represent the true prevalence of Chlamydia.

Participant Demographics

Participants were young adults aged 18-25, with a near-equal distribution of men (50.8%) and women (49.3%).

Statistical Information

P-Value

0.004

Confidence Interval

95% CI 1.14-2.06

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1471-2458-11-230

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication