Acute psychiatric admissions from an out-of-hours Casualty Clinic; how do referring doctors and admitting specialists agree?
2006

Agreement Between Referring Doctors and Hospital Specialists in Psychiatric Admissions

Sample size: 101 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Deraas Trygve S, Hansen Vidje, GiƦver Anton, Olstad Reidun

Primary Institution: University Hospital of North Norway

Hypothesis

How do referring doctors and admitting specialists agree on the need for hospitalization in acute psychiatric cases?

Conclusion

The study found that the casualty clinic physicians and hospital specialists mostly agreed on the need for hospitalization, indicating that most admissions were appropriate.

Supporting Evidence

  • The specialists accepted all but one referral.
  • Seventy-five percent of admissions occurred during weekends or holidays.
  • Thirty percent of admissions were first-time admissions.
  • The police were involved in one third of all admissions.

Takeaway

Doctors at the casualty clinic and hospital mostly agreed on whether patients needed to be admitted for psychiatric care, showing they are good at deciding who needs help.

Methodology

Retrospective, record-based, descriptive study analyzing 101 psychiatric acute referrals.

Potential Biases

The study may underestimate the role of substance abuse and the involvement of police in admissions.

Limitations

Information and assessments made by doctors may be missing, and social background factors were insufficiently documented.

Participant Demographics

Mean age was 32 years, with 55% men; most patients were unmarried and lived alone.

Statistical Information

P-Value

0.004

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1472-6963-6-41

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication