Exploring or Avoiding Novel Food Resources? The Novelty Conflict in an Invasive Bird
2011

Exploring or Avoiding Novel Food Resources in Invasive Birds

Sample size: 60 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Sol Daniel, Griffin Andrea S., Bartomeus Ignasi, Boyce Hayley

Primary Institution: Centre for Ecological Research and Forestry Applications (CREAF), Autonomous University of Barcelona

Hypothesis

The success of animals in new environments depends on their behavioral innovation ability and the balance between exploration and avoidance.

Conclusion

Mynas from highly urbanized environments are faster at solving problems related to food innovation than those from less urbanized areas.

Supporting Evidence

  • Mynas from urban areas resolved technical tasks faster than those from suburban areas.
  • Urban mynas showed lower neophobia and higher exploration rates.
  • Behavioral innovation is linked to the ecological context of the habitat.

Takeaway

Birds that live in cities are better at figuring out how to eat new foods than those that live in the suburbs because they are less scared of new things.

Methodology

The study involved behavioral tests measuring neophobia, consumer innovation, and technical innovation in common mynas from urban and suburban environments.

Potential Biases

Potential biases in individual motivation and environmental factors were controlled for, but the study may still be influenced by unmeasured variables.

Limitations

The study was limited to two geographical regions and may not generalize to other invasive species or environments.

Participant Demographics

36 adult common mynas from Canberra and 24 from Newcastle, with a mix of males and females.

Statistical Information

P-Value

0.017

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1371/journal.pone.0019535

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication