Best Processes for Community Advisory Boards in Research
Author Information
Author(s): Newman Susan D., Andrews Jeannette O., Magwood Gayenell S., Jenkins Carolyn, Cox Melissa J., Williamson Deborah C.
Primary Institution: Medical University of South Carolina
Hypothesis
What are the best processes for forming, operating, and maintaining community advisory boards in community-based participatory research?
Conclusion
Community advisory boards are essential for effective community-based participatory research and require careful planning and management to be successful.
Supporting Evidence
- Community advisory boards provide a structure for community members to voice concerns and priorities.
- Effective CABs can lead to better research outcomes by ensuring community representation.
- Establishing clear roles and expectations for CAB members enhances their effectiveness.
Takeaway
Community advisory boards help researchers work better with communities by making sure everyone's voice is heard and respected.
Methodology
The authors synthesized literature and shared professional experiences to identify best practices for community advisory boards.
Potential Biases
Potential bias may arise if community advisory boards are not representative of the community or if their input is not genuinely considered.
Limitations
Not all community-based researchers have successfully incorporated community advisory boards, and their effectiveness can vary by setting.
Participant Demographics
The community advisory boards included diverse members from various community sectors, including for-profit, nonprofit, and government organizations.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website