Available options for doing more with less: laboratory automation as one tool in the arsenal
1998

Using Laboratory Automation to Improve Efficiency

publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Stephen Scypinski, John Baiano, Theodore Sadlowski

Primary Institution: Pharmaceutical Research and Development, Homann-La Roche Inc.

Hypothesis

Can laboratory automation effectively assist in analytical development for pharmaceutical projects?

Conclusion

Laboratory automation is a useful tool for managing analytical workloads, but it is not suitable for every project.

Supporting Evidence

  • Laboratory automation can help manage increased analytical workloads.
  • Outsourcing and hiring temporary help are also viable options for handling project demands.
  • The effectiveness of automation depends on the specific needs of each project.

Takeaway

This study talks about how using robots and automation can help scientists do their work faster, but sometimes it's better to use people instead.

Methodology

The paper discusses various options for handling analytical workloads, including automation, outsourcing, and hiring temporary help.

Potential Biases

Potential bias in favor of automation due to the authors' affiliations with a pharmaceutical company.

Limitations

The study does not provide specific data or case studies to support its claims.

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication