Fatal injuries while under the influence of psychoactive drugs: a cross-sectional exploratory study in England
2006

Fatal Injuries from Psychoactive Drugs in England

Sample size: 3803 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Oyefeso Adenekan, Schifano Fabrizio, Ghodse Hamid, Cobain Kathryn, Dryden Ruth, Corkery John

Primary Institution: National Programme on Substance Abuse Deaths, Division of Mental Health, Medical School, St George's, University of London

Hypothesis

What is the nature, extent, and pattern of fatal injuries while under the influence of psychoactive drugs?

Conclusion

There are differences in the nature, extent, and pattern of intentional and unintentional fatal injuries under the influence of psychoactive drugs that should necessitate targeted prevention strategies.

Supporting Evidence

  • The study panel accounted for 86% of drug-related deaths in England during the study period.
  • There were 147 cases of fatal injuries under the influence of drugs, with a median age at death of 33 years.
  • The leading mechanism of intentional fatal injuries was suffocation, while road traffic accidents were the most common for unintentional injuries.

Takeaway

This study looked at people who died from injuries while using drugs and found that many of these deaths could be prevented with better safety measures.

Methodology

The study analyzed data from coroners in England over three years, focusing on drug-related deaths and the circumstances surrounding them.

Potential Biases

There may be bias due to reliance on coroners' reports and the exclusion of certain cases.

Limitations

The study may underestimate the true number of fatal injuries due to delays in coronial inquests and the potential misclassification of deaths.

Participant Demographics

The study included individuals aged 16-64 years, with a majority being White (79%), and a notable proportion from Black and Minority Ethnic groups (13%).

Statistical Information

P-Value

0.0001

Confidence Interval

95% CI = 2.9–6.8

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1471-2458-6-148

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication