Artesunate Dose Escalation for the Treatment of Uncomplicated Malaria in a Region of Reported Artemisinin Resistance: A Randomized Clinical Trial
2011

Artesunate Dose Escalation for Malaria Treatment

Sample size: 143 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Delia Bethell, Youry Se, Lon Chanthap, Stuart Tyner, David Saunders, Sabaithip Sriwichai, Sea Darapiseth, Paktiya Teja-Isavadharm, Phisit Khemawoot, Kurt Schaecher, Wiriya Ruttvisutinunt, Jessica Lin, Worachet Kuntawungin, Panita Gosi, Ans Timmermans, Bryan Smith, Socheat Duong, Mark M. Fukuda

Primary Institution: Armed Forces Research Institute of Medical Sciences (AFRIMS), Bangkok, Thailand

Hypothesis

Higher doses of artesunate than currently recommended might be effective in eliminating artemisinin resistant strains of malaria.

Conclusion

Increasing the daily dose of artesunate does not provide a pharmacodynamic benefit for treating uncomplicated malaria, even in areas with emerging artemisinin resistance.

Supporting Evidence

  • Cure rates were high in all treatment groups at 42 days despite almost half the patients remaining parasitemic on Day 3.
  • 19% of patients in the high-dose arm developed neutropenia by Day 14.
  • Patients with parasitemia >10,000/µL had longer median parasite clearance times.

Takeaway

This study tested if giving more artesunate would help treat malaria better, but it found that higher doses didn't work any better than the usual dose.

Methodology

Adult patients with uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria were randomized into three groups receiving different doses of artesunate for 7 days.

Potential Biases

Potential bias due to the open-label design and the variability in individual pharmacokinetic responses.

Limitations

The study was limited by the small sample size in the high-dose group and the inability to demonstrate a dose-dependent effect.

Participant Demographics

Adult patients aged 18-65 with uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.0001

Statistical Significance

p<0.0001

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1371/journal.pone.0019283

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication