Can biomedical and traditional health care providers work together? Zambian practitioners' experiences and attitudes towards collaboration in relation to STIs and HIV/AIDS care: a cross-sectional study
2006

Collaboration between Biomedical and Traditional Health Practitioners in Zambia

Sample size: 296 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Kaboru Berthollet Bwira, Falkenberg Torkel, Ndubani Phillimon, Höjer Bengt, Vongo Rodwell, Brugha Ruairi, Faxelid Elisabeth

Primary Institution: Karolinska Institutet

Hypothesis

Can biomedical and traditional health care providers work together?

Conclusion

There is a willingness among practitioners from both sectors to strengthen collaboration, but significant obstacles remain.

Supporting Evidence

  • Only 24% of biomedical health practitioners reported collaboration with traditional health practitioners in the past six months.
  • 40% of biomedical health practitioners expressed interest in closer collaboration with traditional health practitioners.
  • Both groups acknowledged the potential role of traditional health practitioners in HIV/AIDS care.

Takeaway

Doctors and traditional healers in Zambia want to work together to help people with HIV/AIDS, but there are many challenges that make it hard for them to do so.

Methodology

A cross-sectional study using structured questionnaires was conducted with 152 biomedical health practitioners and 144 traditional health practitioners in two Zambian urban sites.

Potential Biases

Potential bias from using traditional and biomedical practitioners as research assistants may have influenced responses.

Limitations

The study did not categorize traditional health practitioners into different specialties, which may have provided more nuanced insights.

Participant Demographics

The average age of traditional health practitioners was 48 years, with 52% women; biomedical health practitioners averaged 39 years, with 87% women.

Statistical Information

P-Value

0.015

Statistical Significance

p = 0.015

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1478-4491-4-16

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication