Reproductive Hormone Levels in Men Exposed to Persistent Organohalogen Pollutants: A Study of Inuit and Three European Cohorts
2006

Reproductive Hormone Levels in Men Exposed to Persistent Organohalogen Pollutants

Sample size: 749 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Giwercman Aleksander, Rignell-Hydbom Anna, Toft Gunnar, Rylander Lars, Hagmar Lars, Lindh Christian, Pedersen Henning S., Ludwicki Jan K., Lesovoy Vladimir, Shvets Maryna, Spano Marcello, Manicardi Gian Carlo, Bizzaro Davide, Bonefeld-Jorgensen Eva C., Bonde Jens Peter

Primary Institution: Molecular Reproductive Medicine Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences, Malmö University Hospital, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden

Hypothesis

The levels of the two exposure markers should correlate with concentrations of markers of testicular and/or pituitary function.

Conclusion

Gonadotropin levels and SHBG seem to be affected by POP exposure, but the pattern of endocrine response varies geographically.

Supporting Evidence

  • Significant center-to-center variations in associations between exposure and outcomes were observed.
  • Positive associations were found between p,p′-DDE and FSH levels in pooled data.
  • Kharkiv showed significant positive associations between both CB-153 and p,p′-DDE with SHBG and LH.

Takeaway

This study looked at how certain pollutants in the environment might affect men's hormones, and it found that the effects can be different depending on where the men live.

Methodology

The study assessed serum levels of pollutants and reproductive hormones in men from four different populations.

Potential Biases

Potential biases include low participation rates and the possibility of residual confounding.

Limitations

The study may have selection bias as most participants were those who agreed to provide semen samples.

Participant Demographics

Participants included men from Greenland, Poland, Ukraine, and Sweden, with varying exposure to pollutants.

Statistical Information

P-Value

0.03

Confidence Interval

95% CI, 1.0–1.1 IU/L

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1289/ehp.8935

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication