The waist-to-height ratio is a good predictor for insulin resistance in women with polycystic ovary syndrome
2024

Waist-to-Height Ratio as a Predictor for Insulin Resistance in Women with PCOS

Sample size: 882 publication 10 minutes Evidence: high

Author Information

Author(s): Zhu Mengyi, Wang Kaiyue, Feng Jiaxing, Liu Yang, Guan Muxin, Wang Yu, Wu Xiaoke

Primary Institution: Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine

Hypothesis

This study aimed to explore the role of the waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) in assessing insulin resistance (IR) in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS).

Conclusion

The waist-to-height ratio is a simple and reliable measure for predicting the risk of insulin resistance in women with polycystic ovary syndrome.

Supporting Evidence

  • The prevalence rate of insulin resistance was found to be 51.9% among the participants.
  • Women with insulin resistance had significantly higher waist-to-height ratios compared to those without.
  • The waist-to-height ratio was positively correlated with insulin resistance as measured by HOMA-IR.
  • An optimal cut-off point of 0.519 for the waist-to-height ratio was identified for predicting insulin resistance.

Takeaway

The waist-to-height ratio can help doctors figure out if women with a condition called PCOS are at risk for problems with insulin, which is important for their health.

Methodology

A cross-sectional analysis was conducted with 882 women with PCOS, measuring their waist-to-height ratio and evaluating insulin resistance using HOMA-IR.

Limitations

The study's cross-sectional design limits causal interpretations, and it relied on HOMA-IR instead of the gold standard hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp for diagnosing insulin resistance.

Participant Demographics

Women with polycystic ovary syndrome, mean age approximately 28 years.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.001

Confidence Interval

95% CI for ORs ranged from 2.27 to 4.37

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.3389/fendo.2024.1502321

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication