Audit of Cancer Registration Data Quality
Author Information
Author(s): R. Lapham, N.R. Waugh
Primary Institution: University of Dundee
Hypothesis
The accuracy of cancer registration data in the East of Scotland can be evaluated by comparing it to histopathology records.
Conclusion
The quality of cancer registration data is good but could be improved with better coding practices and computerization.
Supporting Evidence
- 186 out of 200 cases had corresponding pathology reports.
- 52 cases had different ICD codes assigned by the pathologist and the Cancer Registrar.
- Major errors of coding were few, but minor and moderate discrepancies were common.
Takeaway
This study looked at how well cancer cases are recorded and found that while most records are accurate, some mistakes happen that could affect cancer statistics.
Methodology
The study compared 200 cancer registrations with histopathology records to identify discrepancies in coding.
Potential Biases
Potential biases may arise from the outdated ICD coding system and the subjective nature of coding discrepancies.
Limitations
The study was limited by the non-computerized nature of the registry and reliance on available pathology reports.
Participant Demographics
Patients registered with the Tayside Regional Cancer Registry in early 1988.
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website