The Automatic Methods Group Newsletter
1995

Automated Non-Invasive Monitoring and Environmental Analysis

publication

Author Information

Author(s): R. F. Edgar, Martin J. T. Milton, P. T. Woods, Jonathan Bouchard, Tom Large, Mary R. Harris, James W. Farrell-Jones, R. W. Finney, Robert Large, Mark Kibblewhite, Dale L. Bacon, M. H. Henderson

Conclusion

The study discusses various automated methods for monitoring environmental conditions and quality assurance in chemical processes.

Supporting Evidence

  • Automated methods can improve the accuracy and efficiency of environmental monitoring.
  • Techniques like acoustic emissions can help monitor chemical reactions in real-time.
  • New sensor technologies can provide rapid assessments of product quality.
  • Field portable analysis can reduce costs and time in identifying contaminants.
  • Legislation is evolving to enhance soil and water protection through better monitoring.

Takeaway

This study shows how machines can help us check the quality of air, water, and products without needing to do everything by hand.

Methodology

The study includes presentations on various automated monitoring techniques and their applications in environmental analysis.

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication