The Internet and Clinical Trials: Background, Online Resources, Examples and Issues
2005

The Internet and Clinical Trials: Background, Online Resources, Examples and Issues

Sample size: 26000 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Paul James, Rachael Seib, Todd Prescott, Ron Marks

Primary Institution: Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University

Conclusion

The Internet can enhance clinical trials by making them more manageable, less expensive, and easier to administer, but security risks remain a significant concern.

Supporting Evidence

  • The Internet has revolutionized global communications and has applications in medicine and research.
  • Online resources can aid in protocol development, funding identification, recruitment, registration, randomization, data collection, analysis, and publication.
  • Over 26,000 patients have been enrolled in the five largest Internet-based clinical trials.

Takeaway

This study talks about how the Internet can help make clinical trials faster and cheaper, but there are worries about keeping patient information safe.

Methodology

The paper reviews the historical development of the Internet and randomized controlled trials, describes available online resources, and discusses examples of online trials.

Potential Biases

Potential selection bias due to reliance on Internet access for patient recruitment.

Limitations

The study does not address the effectiveness of online trials compared to traditional methods in detail.

Participant Demographics

The average Internet user is described as young, white, employed, well-educated, and of higher socio-economic status.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.2196/jmir.7.1.e5

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication