Magnetic resonance imaging assessment of myocardial inflammation in 132 unselected, consecutive patients with clinical suspicion of acute or chronic myocarditis - are we as good as we thought?
2011

MRI Assessment of Myocarditis

Sample size: 132 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Lurz Philipp, Murawski Julia, Steiner Julia, Sareban Mahdi, Eitel Ingo, Desch Steffen, Fuernau Georg, de Waha Suzanne, Grothoff Matthias, Luecke Christian, Nitzsche Stephan, Schuler Gerhard, Gutberlet Matthias, Thiele Holger

Primary Institution: University of Leipzig, Heart Centre Leipzig, Germany

Hypothesis

Can MRI effectively assess myocardial inflammation and necrosis compared to endomyocardial biopsy in unselected patients with suspected myocarditis?

Conclusion

MRI is useful for assessing myocardial inflammation in patients with suspected acute myocarditis, but its performance is insufficient for chronic cases.

Supporting Evidence

  • The accuracy of MRI for assessing myocarditis was 66% overall.
  • In patients with suspected acute myocarditis, MRI accuracy improved to 77%.
  • For chronic myocarditis, MRI accuracy dropped to 52%.

Takeaway

Doctors used MRI to check for heart inflammation in patients who might have myocarditis, and it worked well for those with recent symptoms but not as well for those with long-term symptoms.

Methodology

Patients underwent endomyocardial biopsy, cardiac catheterization, and MRI using a 1.5 Tesla scanner with specific imaging protocols.

Limitations

The study's findings may not apply to preselected patient populations or those with chronic myocarditis.

Participant Demographics

Unselected consecutive patients with clinical suspicion of acute or chronic myocarditis.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1532-429X-13-S1-O3

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication