Recent assembly of an imprinted domain from non-imprinted components
2006

Evolution of the Prader-Willi/Angelman Syndrome Imprinted Domain

Sample size: 60 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Robert W. Rapkins, Tim Hore, Megan Smithwick, Eleanor Ager, Andrew J. Pask, Marilyn B. Renfree, Matthias Kohn, Horst Hameister, Robert D. Nicholls, Janine E. Deakin, Jennifer A. Marshall Graves

Primary Institution: Australian National University

Hypothesis

How and why did genomic imprinting evolve in mammals?

Conclusion

The PWS-AS imprinted region was assembled relatively recently from non-imprinted components in a mammalian ancestor.

Supporting Evidence

  • The PWS-AS genes are located on different chromosomes in kangaroos and platypus.
  • Imprinting of UBE3A and SNRPN is not observed in marsupials and monotremes.
  • The arrangement of PWS-AS genes differs significantly between placental mammals and their ancestors.

Takeaway

Some genes in humans only work if they come from one parent, and this study found out how those genes changed over time in mammals.

Methodology

The study involved comparing gene arrangements and expressions in humans, marsupials, and monotremes.

Limitations

The conclusions are based on limited expression data from only three of the ~80 genes imprinted in placental mammals.

Participant Demographics

The study involved tammar wallabies and platypuses.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1371/journal.pgen.0020182

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication