Measuring Patient-Reported Outcomes: Moving Beyond Misplaced Common Sense to Hard Science
Author Information
Author(s): Stephen P. McKenna
Primary Institution: Galen Research Ltd
Hypothesis
The article questions the common perception that measuring patient-reported outcomes is a simple task and argues for a more scientific approach.
Conclusion
Good quality measurement of patient-reported outcomes is complex and requires expertise, yet many existing questionnaires are poorly designed and of limited value.
Supporting Evidence
- Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are often developed without sufficient scientific consideration.
- Many existing questionnaires collect irrelevant information and are of poor quality.
- Effective PROMs require careful development and validation processes.
Takeaway
This article says that asking patients how they feel about their health is important, but we need to ask the right questions in the right way to get useful answers.
Methodology
The article reviews the development and validation processes for patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and discusses the importance of using scientifically sound methods.
Potential Biases
There is a risk of bias in the development of PROMs due to reliance on common sense rather than scientific rigor.
Limitations
The article highlights that many PROMs are poorly designed and do not adequately capture the patient's perspective.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website