Cost Effectiveness of Chest Pain Unit Care in the NHS
Author Information
Author(s): Oluboyede Yemi, Goodacre Steve, Wailoo Allan, the ESCAPE Research Team
Primary Institution: University of Sheffield
Hypothesis
Is chest pain unit care more cost-effective than routine care for patients with acute chest pain?
Conclusion
Chest pain unit care is likely to be slightly more effective and less expensive than routine care, but the estimates are uncertain.
Supporting Evidence
- CPU care resulted in a non-significant increase in effectiveness of 0.0075 QALYs per patient.
- There was a non-significant cost decrease of £32 per patient with CPU care.
- The probability that CPU care is cost-effective is about 70% at a willingness to pay threshold of £20,000 per QALY.
Takeaway
This study looked at whether special care for chest pain patients is cheaper and better than regular care. It found that while it might be a little better and cheaper, we can't be sure.
Methodology
An economic evaluation using a decision-analytic model based on data from the ESCAPE multicentre trial and other sources.
Potential Biases
There is a risk that the implementation of CPU care may lead to increased attendances without improved outcomes.
Limitations
The analysis assumes that CPU and routine care will be applied to the same population, which may not hold true if CPU care increases attendances.
Participant Demographics
Patients with acute chest pain attending emergency departments.
Statistical Information
P-Value
p = 0.146
Confidence Interval
95% CI -0.0168 to 0.0337
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website