Isolation of Non-Tuberculous Mycobacteria in Uganda
Author Information
Author(s): Kankya Clovice, Muwonge Adrian, Djønne Berit, Munyeme Musso, Opuda-Asibo John, Skjerve Eystein, Oloya James, Edvardsen Vigdis, Johansen Tone B
Primary Institution: Department of Veterinary Public Health, Makerere University
Hypothesis
What are the sources and public health significance of non-tuberculous mycobacteria in pastoral ecosystems of Uganda?
Conclusion
The study found a variety of potentially pathogenic non-tuberculous mycobacteria in the environment of pastoral communities in Uganda, with untreated water and close contact with domestic animals posing significant risks.
Supporting Evidence
- 48 isolates of non-tuberculous mycobacteria were detected from 310 environmental samples.
- 25.3% of soil samples, 11.8% of water samples, and 9.1% of animal fecal samples contained mycobacteria.
- Drinking untreated water was identified as a major risk factor for exposure to non-tuberculous mycobacteria.
- Close contact with domestic animals was also associated with increased risk of infection.
- Multivariable logistic regression analysis confirmed the significance of untreated water consumption.
Takeaway
This study shows that drinking untreated water and being around farm animals can make people sick from certain germs found in the environment.
Methodology
The study involved collecting and analyzing 310 environmental samples (soil, water, and animal feces) and conducting a questionnaire survey with 231 pastoralists.
Potential Biases
Potential bias due to the reliance on self-reported data from the questionnaire and the challenges in accurately diagnosing mycobacterial infections.
Limitations
The study lacked accurate case diagnoses of disease in the communities sampled, which may affect the reliability of linking environmental isolates to human infections.
Participant Demographics
The study involved 231 pastoralists from Mubende and Nakasongola districts in Uganda.
Statistical Information
P-Value
0.0001
Confidence Interval
11.1-100
Statistical Significance
p<0.05
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website