An examination of the initial cancer consultation of medical and radiation oncologists using the Cancode interaction analysis system
2008

Analysis of Cancer Consultations

Sample size: 155 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Dimoska A, Butow P N, Dent E, Arnold B, Brown R F, Tattersall M H N

Primary Institution: University of Sydney

Hypothesis

Do medical and radiation oncologists vary their consultation styles and how does this affect patient outcomes?

Conclusion

Medical oncologists are generally more patient-centered and warmer than radiation oncologists, which positively impacts patient outcomes.

Supporting Evidence

  • Medical oncologists allowed more patient input and were rated as warmer compared to radiation oncologists.
  • Patients with warmer oncologists had better psychological adjustment and reduced anxiety.
  • Consultation styles varied based on patient demographics such as gender and age.

Takeaway

This study looked at how doctors talk to cancer patients. It found that some doctors are nicer and listen more, which helps patients feel better.

Methodology

Patients were audiotaped during their first consultation, and the transcripts were analyzed using the Cancode interaction analysis system.

Potential Biases

Potential bias due to the subjective nature of coding and the limited diversity of the oncologist sample.

Limitations

The study's findings may not be generalizable due to the limited number of oncologists and the single location of the study.

Participant Demographics

{"age":{"mean":55.9,"range":"22-82"},"gender":{"female":45,"male":55},"education_level":{"below_year_10":30.7,"year_10":30.1,"year_12":10.5,"tertiary_non_university":9.8,"university":19.0},"marital_status":{"married_or_de_facto":68.6,"single":13.7,"divorced_or_separated":9.8,"widowed":7.8}}

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.001

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1038/sj.bjc.6604348

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication