Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty in Revision Surgery
Author Information
Author(s): Bergert Patricia, Henkelmann Ralf, Hepp Pierre, Theopold Jan
Primary Institution: University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
Hypothesis
The study aims to determine how the clinical outcome of secondary reverse shoulder arthroplasty (SRSA) is affected by the indication for revision surgery.
Conclusion
The study found that the indication for surgery significantly influences the clinical outcomes of SRSA, with the highest scores in the post-infection group and the lowest in the failed humerus fracture group.
Supporting Evidence
- The study included 65 patients, with 39 completing the questionnaire.
- The average follow-up duration was 44 months.
- The highest Constant score was 66 points in the post-infection group.
Takeaway
This study looked at patients who had shoulder surgery and found that those who had surgery for infections did better than those who had surgery for broken bones.
Methodology
The study was a retrospective analysis of 65 patients who underwent SRSA, with data collected via questionnaires sent by mail.
Potential Biases
The study included only completely filled questionnaires to minimize bias.
Limitations
The study's retrospective design may lead to higher case losses, and there was a lack of preoperative scores.
Participant Demographics
The cohort included 39 patients (23 women, 16 men) with an average age of 68.03 years.
Statistical Information
P-Value
{"Constant Score":0.196,"DASH Score":0.16,"EQ-5D-5L":0.683}
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website