Integrative Medicine: A Tale of Two Clinics
Author Information
Author(s): Heather S. Boon, Natasha Kachan
Primary Institution: University of Toronto
Hypothesis
What factors are necessary for the successful integration of complementary and alternative medicine with conventional medicine in clinical settings?
Conclusion
The programs were ultimately successful because of the credibility of the champions, institutional facilitators, and the staff members.
Supporting Evidence
- Both programs required champions to advocate for and establish the integrative services.
- Credibility of the champions and facilitators was crucial for acceptance in both settings.
- Finding the right practitioners was essential for the success of the integrative teams.
- Trust developed between practitioners and the host institution was vital for program growth.
- Space limitations were a significant challenge for both integrative medicine programs.
Takeaway
This study looked at two clinics that combined different types of medicine. They found that having strong leaders and good teamwork helped them succeed.
Methodology
The study used applied ethnography, including interviews and content analysis, to identify key themes from two integrative medicine programs.
Limitations
The study only compared two clinics, which may limit the generalizability of the findings.
Participant Demographics
Participants included 42 from St Michael's Hospital and 44 from the CARE Program, comprising various healthcare professionals.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website