Influenza Virus Samples and Global Health Diplomacy
Author Information
Author(s): David P. Fidler
Primary Institution: Indiana University School of Law
Hypothesis
How does Indonesia's withholding of avian influenza virus samples illustrate the role of international law in global health diplomacy?
Conclusion
The incident highlights both the importance and limitations of international law in addressing global health issues.
Supporting Evidence
- Indonesia's withholding of samples was a reaction to perceived inequities in the global health system.
- The World Health Assembly adopted a resolution to address the crisis caused by Indonesia's actions.
- International law principles were used by both Indonesia and WHO to frame their positions in the dispute.
- The resolution aimed to ensure fair and equitable sharing of benefits from influenza virus samples.
Takeaway
Indonesia didn't share bird flu samples, which caused problems for global health. This shows how countries can use laws to protect their resources.
Methodology
The article reviews the controversy and analyzes key international legal issues surrounding Indonesia's decision.
Limitations
The resolution and discussions did not resolve the fundamental legal questions regarding sovereignty and sample sharing.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website