A Meta-Analysis of Local Adaptation in Plants
2008

Local Adaptation in Plants

Sample size: 1032 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Leimu Roosa, Fischer Markus

Primary Institution: Institute for Biochemistry and Biology, University of Potsdam

Hypothesis

Is local adaptation in plants influenced by species, population, and habitat characteristics?

Conclusion

Local plants generally perform better than foreign plants, but local adaptation is less common than previously assumed.

Supporting Evidence

  • Local plants performed better than foreign plants in 71.0% of the studied sites.
  • Local adaptation was much more common in large populations than in small populations.
  • Maladaptation occurred in only 3.3% of the cases.

Takeaway

Plants that grow in their home area usually do better than those from far away, but this doesn't happen as often as we thought, especially for small plant groups.

Methodology

A meta-analysis of 35 studies comparing local and foreign plant performance across 1032 pairwise comparisons.

Potential Biases

Potential bias due to the selection of studies that may favor pronounced local adaptation.

Limitations

The study primarily focused on herbaceous plants in temperate regions, which may limit the generalizability of the findings.

Participant Demographics

The study included 32 plant species from various habitats.

Statistical Information

P-Value

0.0026

Confidence Interval

95% CI = 0.2499 to 0.0736

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1371/journal.pone.0004010

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication